0xe30d…e3e0rfq block🦐 Shrimp

0xe30d53865b5f172c0ea08efe7f600059f4cae3e0on Derive since 16 Sep

90d PnL, marked

-$8.5

-$3.0 realized · -$5.5 open

30d · 7d

-$8.5

-$8.5 last 7 days

Return on gross

-0.1%

$17K average book

Sortino · Sharpe

-10.0 · -7.9

0 of 1 weeks positive

Max drawdown

-$11.5

peak to trough, 90d

Copy it, 7d

-$4.4

-0.03% following every fill

Equity, 90 days

Realized plus open positions at mark, daily, net of fees.

How they trade, 30 days

Fills: 2 · 2 options, 0 perps
Notional: $16.9K · avg $8.4K
Calls bought / sold: 1 / 1
Puts bought / sold: 0 / 0
Maker · RFQ: 0% · 2 fills
Instruments · subaccounts: 2 · 1
Far-OTM buys: 1
Fees paid: $3.0

options 100%perps 0%

Two-sided maker ratio 0%.

Open positions

2 positions in 1 book, marked at the live Derive mark (Deribit where Derive has none); unrealized -$4.4 against the average entry of the fills we have seen. Expired options excluded.

Book	Positions	Notional	Unrealized	Shape	Nearest expiry
ETH	2	$17K	-$4	short ETH 7k call, 26 Mar 27 ×3.5 · long ETH 5k call, 26 Mar 27 ×3.5	26 Mar 27

Recent fills

RFQ legs grouped into one trade, runs of same-way fills into one sweep · times in UTC.

When	What	Size	Price	Notional	Realized
16 Sep 12:21	Bought bull call spread ETH 5k/7k 26 Mar 27rfq · 2 legs	3.5	$27.66	$8.4K	–

How PnL and positions are computed

PnL is our own accounting: average-cost realized plus open positions at the live mark, net of fees, with expired options settled at intrinsic.

Positions are reconstructed from public fills since 2026-06-09, so anything opened before that shows only the part traded since. The realized column on fills is Derive's per-fill figure, shown for reference only.

Back to the leaderboard.