optionly
HomeTradersCohortsSmart MoneyFlowArbOptionsMarkets
DeriveDeribit
Trade on Derive
optionly

Trader intelligence for Derive: who is trading, what they hold, who is good, and what the rules say is mispriced. Built from public fills and quotes, refreshed every few minutes.

HomeTradersCohortsSmart moneyFlowArbOptionsMarketsTrade spotlightHow smart money is scoredHow the homepage is built

Every number on the site is computed from public data by fixed rules; nothing is hand-picked except the wallets we say we follow. Nothing here is investment advice. Links to Derive may use Optionly's broker code, which pays Optionly a share of exchange fees at no cost to you. © 2026 Optionly.

0x90a1…5777wing buyertrades via RFQ🐬 Dolphin

0x90a19a15d58252710c4b53fb4b25f72b53575777owner 0xd90a…5721on Derive since 14 Jul
90d PnL, marked
+$18.5K
-$1.1K realized · +$19.6K open
30d · 7d
+$16.4K
+$13.5K last 7 days
Return on gross
2.1%
$876.2K average book
Sortino · Sharpe
0.8 · 0.5
4 of 11 weeks positive
Max drawdown
-$56.1K
peak to trough, 90d
Account balances$273K
valued 20 Sep 21:56 UTC
2 accounts valued live by Derive: collateral plus open positions at mark, 8 positions on the exchange. This is balance, not trading PnL; deposits and withdrawals move it.
AccountValueCollateralPositionsMargin headroom
#61617 SM · 18 markets$171KUSDC 3066$306.1 · 0%
#71186 PM2 · BTC, ETH$102KUSDC -47.8K2$27.2K · 27%
Trading PnL, 90 days
Cumulative trading PnL, including open positions at mark, net of fees. This is not account balance.
How they trade, 30 days
Fills
17 · 17 options, 0 perps
Notional
$4.1M · avg $239K
Calls bought / sold
9 / 8
Puts bought / sold
0 / 0
Maker · RFQ
0% · 17 fills
Instruments · subaccounts
3 · 2
Far-OTM buys
1
Fees paid
$822.2
options 100%perps 0%

Two-sided maker ratio 0% · 4 winning and 7 losing closes.

Open positions
8 positions in 2 books, 8 with available marks (Derive first, Deribit fallback); unrealized +$24.1K against the average entry of the fills we have seen. Expired options excluded. Missing marks are excluded from the subtotal.
BookPositionsNotionalUnrealizedShapeNearest expiry
4$4M+$8Klong BTC 90k call, 25 Jun 27 ×20 · long BTC 90k call, 25 Jun 27 ×14 · 2 more25 Jun 27
4$333K+$16Klong ETH 2.6k call, 26 Mar 27 ×50 · long ETH 2.4k call, 26 Mar 27 ×35 · 2 more26 Mar 27
Recent fills
RFQ legs grouped into one trade, runs of same-way fills into one sweep · times in UTC.
WhenWhatSizePriceNotionalExchange-reported realized
9 Sep 01:05Bought long ETH 3k call, 25 Jun 27rfq20$353.55$49.9K–
9 Sep 01:03Bought bull call spread BTC 90k/125k 25 Jun 27rfq · 2 legs2$14,590.71$315K–
9 Sep 01:01Bought bull call spread BTC 90k/125k 25 Jun 27rfq · 2 legs2$14,569.50$315K–
9 Sep 00:59Bought bull call spread BTC 90k/125k 25 Jun 27rfq · 2 legs2$14,579.81$315K–
9 Sep 00:57Bought bull call spread BTC 90k/125k 25 Jun 27rfq · 2 legs2$14,580.81$315.1K–
9 Sep 00:54Bought bull call spread BTC 90k/125k 25 Jun 27rfq · 2 legs2$14,574.85$315.1K–
9 Sep 00:42Bought bull call spread BTC 90k/125k 25 Jun 27rfq · 2 legs2$14,475.75$314.5K–
9 Sep 00:39Bought bull call spread BTC 90k/125k 25 Jun 27rfq · 2 legs2$14,499.46$314.6K–
9 Sep 00:37Bought bull call spread BTC 90k/125k 25 Jun 27rfq · 2 legs3$14,477.28$471.7K–
21 Aug 05:23Bought long ETH 2.5k call, 26 Mar 27rfq5$361.79$11.8K–
21 Aug 05:22Bought long ETH 2.6k call, 26 Mar 2750$324.90$117.8K–
21 Aug 05:20Bought long ETH 2.5k call, 26 Mar 27rfq15$364.11$35.4K–
21 Aug 05:18Bought long ETH 2.4k call, 26 Mar 27rfq10$403.03$23.6K–
21 Aug 05:05Bought long ETH 2.4k call, 26 Mar 27rfq5$397.58$11.8K–
21 Aug 05:03Bought long ETH 2.4k call, 26 Mar 27rfq5$399.28$11.8K–
21 Aug 05:01Bought long ETH 2.4k call, 26 Mar 27rfq5$398.64$11.8K–
21 Aug 04:59Bought long ETH 2.5k call, 26 Mar 27rfq5$359.20$11.8K–
21 Aug 04:56Bought long ETH 2.5k call, 26 Mar 27rfq10$359.21$23.5K–
21 Aug 04:54Bought long ETH 2.4k call, 26 Mar 27rfq10$399.60$23.5K–
15 Jul 19:46Bought 2-leg BTC packagerfq · 2 legs5$746.00$324.5K+$316.6
15 Jul 19:37Bought 2-leg BTC packagerfq · 2 legs5$757.00$324.3K+$261.6
15 Jul 19:28Sold short BTC 67k call, 17 Jul 26rfq7$45.00$453.6K-$620.1
15 Jul 19:27Sold short BTC 67k call, 17 Jul 26rfq5$45.00$323.9K-$443.1
15 Jul 19:24Sold 2-leg BTC packagerfq · 2 legs5$773.00$323.8K–
15 Jul 19:21Bought 2-leg BTC packagerfq · 2 legs5$855.70$323.8K+$145.4
15 Jul 19:21Bought 2-leg BTC packagerfq · 2 legs5$852.00$323.6K+$163.9
14 Jul 18:07Bought long BTC 64k put, 31 Jul 260.0033$1,740.00$212.9-$1.0
14 Jul 18:07Bought long BTC 67k call, 17 Jul 2610 fills7$114.86$451.7K–
14 Jul 18:04Bought long BTC 67k call, 17 Jul 26rfq5$115.00$322.8K–
14 Jul 17:53Sold short BTC 64k put, 31 Jul 26rfq0.67$1,554.00$43.3K–
14 Jul 17:53Bought long BTC 68k call, 31 Jul 26rfq5$688.00$322.8K–
14 Jul 17:52Bought long BTC 68k call, 31 Jul 26rfq5$685.00$322.9K–
14 Jul 17:52Sold short BTC 64k put, 31 Jul 26rfq5$1,581.81$323K–
14 Jul 17:50Sold short BTC 64k put, 31 Jul 264.3333$1,630.00$279.4K–
14 Jul 17:40Bought long BTC 68k call, 31 Jul 26rfq5$656.00$322.1K–
14 Jul 17:39Sold short BTC 64k put, 31 Jul 26rfq5$1,657.09$322.1K–
How PnL and positions are computed

PnL is our own accounting: average-cost realized plus open positions at the live mark, net of fees, with expired options settled at intrinsic. Derive’s own per-fill realized figure would say $0; it books phantom amounts on RFQ opening legs and never settles expiries, so we do not use it.

Derive shows this account under its owner address 0xd90a4d7d72f7a5ddbe1d5e135220aa1de3315721; trades are reported under the smart-wallet address above. Either works in the URL.

The 7-day follow estimate uses marked taker fills, before fees and slippage, divided by traded notional. Missing marks are excluded; expired options use an estimated settlement from the latest stored underlying price. It is not a return on account capital.

Positions are reconstructed from public fills since 2026-06-09, so anything opened before that shows only the part traded since. The realized column on fills is Derive's per-fill figure, shown for reference only.

Back to the leaderboard.

Page calculated 20 Sept, 21:56 UTC. Quotes and synced statistics may be older. Reload to check for updates; a cached page may appear while a newer snapshot is prepared.